1,778 | 80 | 19 |
下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
以深沪两市A股上市公司2008~2014年的年度数据为样本,在产融结合理论与投融资理论相融合的统一分析框架下,探讨参股金融机构对企业投融资行为的影响机制和作用效果,运用递归式的中介效应模型考察发现,作为克服制度缺陷的一种替代机制,金融关联能通过多种途径给企业带来融资优势,且此效应在民营企业中表现更突出,但金融关联对投资效率的影响具有双刃剑效应,一方面能够缓解因资金短缺导致的投资不足,另一方面也可能加剧企业的投资过度。进一步分析显示,融资优势是金融关联与资本投资之间的中介变量,受到公司治理机制的影响。通过外部融资的部分中介效应,金融关联可能加剧国有企业的过度投资,但对民营企业的过度投资无显著影响;在投资不足方面,金融关联对国有和民营两类企业投资不足的缓解作用都较突出,而且金融关联带来的融资优势在此过程中扮演着完全中介的角色。
Abstract:By adopting the A-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Markets between 2008 and 2014 as panel data and establishing the unified analytical framework for the integration of financial-industrial integration theory and investment and finance theory,this paper selects the ownership of financial institutions as a research perspective and investigates the effect mechanism and economic consequences of the financial relationship on the investment and financing behavior. The recursive model of mediating effect shows that: financial relationship,as an alternative mechanism,can significantly ease financing constraints through a variety of ways,especially for private enterprises. It impacts the investment efficiency in two ways. On the one hand,through the mediating effect of external financing,financial relationship can help to alleviate the underinvestment problem caused by capital shortage; on the other hand,it may also exacerbate the overinvestment. Further research shows that financing advantage is an intermediary variable between financial relationship and capital investment,but at the same time,it is influenced by the corporate governance mechanism. Through the partial intermediary effect of external financing advantages,financial relationship may significantly exacerbate the overinvestment of state-owned enterprises,while having no significant effect on the overinvestment of private enterprises. With regard to the underinvestment,financial relationship can significantly alleviate the underinvestment in state-owned and private enterprises. What's more,the external financing advantage of financial relationship plays a role of complete intermediator in this process.
[1]Allen F,Qian J,Qian M J.2015.Law,finance,and economic growth in China.Journal of Financial Economics,Vol.77:57-116.
[2]周莉,韩霞.产融结合资本配置效应的理论分析[J].中央财经大学学报,2010(2).
[3]蔺元.我国上市公司产融结合效果分析—基于参股非上市金融机构视角的实证研究[J].南开管理评论,2010,(5):153-160.
[4]Lu,Z F,Zhu J G,Zhang W N.2012.Bank discrimination,holding bank ownership,and economic consequences:evidence from China.Journal of Banking&Finance,Vol.36,No.2:341-354.
[5]陈栋,陈运森.银行股权关联、货币政策变更与上市公司现金管理[J].金融研究.2012(12).
[6]Haubrich J G.1998.Financial Intermediation:Delegated Monitoring and Long-term Relationships[J].Journal of Banking&Finance,Vol.13,No.1:9-20.
[7]Kano M,Uchida H,Udell G F,Watanab W.2011.Information verifiability,bank organization,bank competition and bank-borrower relationships.Journal of Banking&Finance,Vol.35,No.4:935~954.
[8]祝继高,陆正飞.融资需求、产权性质与股权融资歧视—基于企业上市问题的研究[J].南开管理评论.2012(4).
[9]Jensen M C,Meckling W.1976.Theory of the firm:managerial behavior,agency costs,and ownership structure.Journal of Financial Economics,,Vol.3,No.4:305-360.
[10]田利辉.国有产权、预算软约束和中国上市公司杠杆治理[J].管理世界,2005(7).
[11]赵晶,关鑫,高闯.社会资本控制链替代了股权控制链吗?—上市公司终极股东双重隐形控制链的构建与动用[J].管理世界,2010(3).
[12]Richardson S A.2006.Overinvestment of free cash flow.Review of Accounting Studies,Vol.11,No.2:159-189.
[13]Baron R M,Kenny D A.,1986.The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:conceptual,strategic,and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,Vol.51,No.6:1173-1182.
[14]温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰,刘红云.中介效应检验程序及其应用[J].心理学报,2004(5).
[15]王化成,李志杰,孙健.境外上市背景下治理机制对公司价值的影响—基于融资决策传导效应的研究[J].会计研究,2008(7).
[16]Mc Lean R,Zhang T Y,Zhao M X.2012.Why does the law matter?Investor protection and its effects on investment,finance,and growth.Review of Accounting Studies,,Vol.67,No.1:313-350.
(1)注释:如中国人民银行1999年颁布的《关于向金融机构投资人股的暂行规定》;1999年颁布的《证券法》;2001年中国人民银行发布的《商业银行中间业务暂行规定》;2003年颁布的《商业银行法》;2005年颁布的《商业银行设立基金管理公司试点管理办法》;2010年发布的《国务院关于鼓励和引导民间投资健康发展的若干意见》等。
(1)在分组检验时系数的组间差异是否显著是我们的基本判断依据。同时,为了克服传统Wald检验的小样本偏误,我们借鉴连玉君和苏治的方法,采用自体抽样法(Bootstrap)来检验系数组间差异的显著性,通过自体抽样(Bootstrap)1000次所估算得到的经验P值来判定系数的组间差异是否显著。与传统检验中的P值相同,如果Bootstrap法所得的经验P值小于某一置信水平(如1%、5%或10%),则说明回归系数的组间差异在相应置信水平上显著。
基本信息:
DOI:
中图分类号:F832.51
引用信息:
[1]蒋水全,刘星,王雷.金融关联、融资优势与投资效率——基于融资中介效应的实证考察[J].金融经济学研究,2017,32(02):52-65.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金重点项目(71232004);国家自然科学基金面上项目(71172082);; 国家自然科学青年科学基金项目(71302117)