nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo searchdiv qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2015, 05, v.30;No.157 83-93
绿色信贷影响企业债务融资成本吗?——基于绿色企业与“两高”企业的对比研究
基金项目(Foundation):
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
11,842 492 148
下载次数 被引频次 阅读次数
摘要:

以20002014年中国上市公司为样本,从债务融资成本的角度分析绿色信贷对绿色企业与"两高"企业影响的实证研究结果表明,绿色信贷政策有效推动了绿色企业发展,遏制了"两高"企业发展。在横截面上,绿色企业与"两高"企业相比承担较低的债务融资成本。这种显著的差异与绿色信贷政策的出台密切相关,在经济意义上也是重要的。在时间趋势上,绿色企业债务融资成本随着时间的推移得到了相应改善。但是,绿色信贷需要相配套的双向监管体系,确保绿色贷款专款专用。

Abstract:

The green economy focuses on optimizing the balance of scale and effect and green credit policy advocates energy saving,emission reduction and achievements of the green industrial revolution. Based on the sample of listed firms during the period from 2000 to 2014,this paper investigates the differences between green businesses and"two high"businesses from debt financing cost aspect. This paper finds the debt financing cost of green businesses reduces due to the implement of green credit policy. Cross- sectional data shows green businesses bear much lower debt financing cost compared with"two high"businesses.The differences are also inspiring from the economics aspect. Besides,there is a tendency that the debt financing cost of green businesses decreases as time passes by. Therefore,it is obvious that green credit policy effectively promotes the development of green businesses and constrains the development of"two high"businesses. Of course,the green credit needs two- directional regulatory system to ensure that the green loans are earmarked. In this way,green credit policy will help to promote economic sustainable development.

参考文献

[1]Climent F.,and Soriano P.,2011.Green and Good?-The Investment Performance of US Environmental Mutual Funds.Journal of Business Ethics,Vol.103,No.2:275-287.

[2]张秀生,李子明.“绿色信贷”执行效率与地方政府行为[J].经济问题,2009(3).

[3]Duan J.,and Niu M.Q.,2010.The Paradox of Green Credit in China.Paper Presented at the Meeting of the ICEED2010,Kuala Lumpur.

[4]Shen B.,Wang J.,and Li M.,2013.China's Approaches to Financing Sustainable Development:Policies,Practices,and Issues.Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Energy&Environment,Vol.2,No.2:178-198.

[5]Guo P.Y.,2014.Financial Policy Innovation for Social Change:A Case Study of China's Green Credit Policy.International Review of Sociology,Vol.24,No.1:69-76.

[6]万后芬.绿色产业的发展与传统产业的绿化[J].中南财经政法大学学报,2002(6).

[7]Ferguson M.F.,and Peters S.R.,1995.What Constitutes Evidence of Discrimination in Lending?Journal of Finance,Vol.50,No.2:739-748.

[8]Munell A.H.,Tootell G.M.B.,Browne L.E.,and Mc Eneaney J.,1996.Mortgage Lending In Boston:Interpreting HMDA Data.American Economic Review,Vol.86,No.1:25-53.

[9]David G.B.,Phillip B.L.,and David J.Z.,2003.Discrimination in the Small-Business Credit Market.Review of Economic and Statistics,Vol.85,No.4:930-943.

[10]Brandt L.,and Li H.B.,2003.Bank Discrimination in Transition Economics:Ideology,Information,or Incentives?Journal of Comparative Economics,Vol.31,No.3:387-413.

[11]李广子,刘力.债务融资成本与民营信贷歧视[J].金融研究,2009(12).

[12]罗宏,陈丽霖.增值税转型对企业融资约束的影响研究[J].会计研究,2012(12).

[13]饶华春.中国金融发展与企业融资约束的缓解——基于广义矩估计的动态面板数据分析[J].金融研究,2009(9).

[14]姜付秀,陆正飞.多元化与资本成本的关系——来自中国股票市场的证据[J].会计研究,2006(6).

[15]邓翔,向书坚,唐毅.中国上市公司融资约束的行业特征分析——基于641家上市公司的Logistic回归分析[J].宏观经济研究,2014(1).

[16]程六兵,王竹泉.信贷歧视与银行股份制改革——基于借款逾期公司的经验证据[J].财经研究,2015(6).

[17]喻坤,李治国,张晓蓉,徐剑刚.企业投资效率之谜:融资约束假说与货币政策冲击[J].经济研究,2014(5).

[18]王义中,宋敏.宏观经济不确定性、资金需求与公司投资[J].经济研究,2014(2).

[19]张强,韩俊莹.中国信贷政策对产业结构调整效应研究[J].金融经济学研究,2015(1).

12003年6月花旗银行、巴克莱银行、荷兰银行和西德意志州立银行等10家国际银行宣布施行赤道原则,后逐渐被世界主要金融机构所接受,成为评估、管理项目融资环境与社会风险的金融行业基准。赤道原则网站,http://www.equator-principles.com/。

1在考虑企业所属地区对企业债务融资成本影响的同时,本文将样本分为沪市、深市两个子样本,并重复了上述检验。检验结果表明,基准模型估计结果不会受到企业上市地点差异的影响。

基本信息:

DOI:

中图分类号:F275;F832.4

引用信息:

[1]连莉莉.绿色信贷影响企业债务融资成本吗?——基于绿色企业与“两高”企业的对比研究[J].金融经济学研究,2015,30(05):83-93.

基金信息:

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文